Understand the Differences: Data Warehouse, Data Lake and Data Lakehouse

It may seem hard to believe, but 80% of the world's data today comes from unstructured files. When I think about this reality, I'm struck by how the storage and analysis landscape has completely changed in companies. The evolution of data warehouse and data lake solutions occurred precisely to address this flood of big data that came with Web 2.0, along with the rise of cloud computing and mobile in the late 2000s.

Today, we face increasingly greater challenges managing and extracting value from these massive volumes of information. It's no exaggeration to say that understanding the difference between a data lake and a data warehouse has become fundamental to any effective data strategy. A new architecture has also emerged to combine the best of both worlds: the data lakehouse. This hybrid solution reduces operational costs, simplifies processes, and improves efficiency and data governance.

The question many people ask is: which of these architectures actually works best for each situation?

Here, we'll explore the characteristics of each of these solutions in detail. Traditional data warehouses work with structured data, data lakes offer high flexibility for handling various types of information, and data lakehouses can process petabytes of data with support for multiple engines.

Ultimately, you'll clearly understand these differences and be able to identify which solution works best for your organization.

Data Warehouse: Structure, Advantages and Limitations

_{Image Source: ProjectPro}

A data warehouse functions as a centralized repository of historical and current data from multiple sources, created specifically for analytics, reporting, and business intelligence. Unlike conventional databases, which store operational transactions, data warehouses are optimized for complex analytical queries and strategic decision-making.

Relational storage with schema-on-write

Here, it's important to understand how the data warehouse uses the schema-on-write principle, where the data structure is defined before storage. All data undergoes a validation and formatting process to conform to a predefined schema before being written to the system. This approach ensures:

• Consistent and complete data: Since all information must follow a specific scheme, data consistency and quality are ensured from the start.
• Fast recovery: Data is immediately available for queries after being loaded, as it is already in the appropriate format for analysis.
• Well-defined metadata: Schema-on-write facilitates metadata management and data cataloging, simplifying governance.

However, there is a downside to this method. It requires more time to prepare the data and offers less flexibility for later schema modifications.

ETL process and architectural layers

A data warehouse architecture is typically organized into three main layers and relies heavily on the ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process. This process is critical and can be time-consuming. up to 80% of total time of developing a data warehouse project.

Bottom layer: It serves as the system's foundation, receiving data from various sources such as ERPs, CRMs, and transactional systems. This is where extraction occurs, the first stage of ETL, where raw data is collected.

Middle layer: Traditionally built around an OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) engine, optimized for rapid analysis. This layer is where data transformation takes place, which involves:

• Cleaning and standardization
• Correction of inconsistencies
• Enrichment and structuring

Top layer: Includes end-user interfaces, reporting tools, and dashboards. Loading, the final step of ETL, makes the transformed data available for analysis and reporting.

Use Cases in BI and Enterprise Reporting

Data warehouses play a fundamental role in a variety of business scenarios, particularly in business intelligence and advanced analytics. Key use cases include:

• Customer segmentation: Allows you to analyze behaviors and preferences for personalized marketing strategies.
• Financial reports: Consolidates data from multiple sources for financial performance analysis.
• Historical trend analysis: Uses data accumulated over time to identify patterns.
• Supply chain optimization: Analyze inventory, sales, and supplier data to improve efficiency.
• Sales performance monitoring: Provides a consolidated view of business operations.

Companies that implement data warehouses can make faster, more informed decisions by centralizing data from multiple sources into a single, trusted repository.

Challenges with unstructured data and scalability

However, traditional data warehouses face significant limitations. First, they are designed primarily for structured data, struggling with unstructured formats such as images, videos, and text. Considering that unstructured data represents 90% of all the data currently generated, this limitation is considerable.

Furthermore, as organizations grow, the volume of data increases exponentially, creating scalability challenges. Traditional on-premises systems often struggle to:

• Dealing with large-scale datasets
• Process high query loads
• Meet real-time processing demands

Costs also become a concern, as data warehouses require more data processing and preparation, making them more expensive and less flexible for large volumes. Nevertheless, for structured analysis and reliable reporting, the data warehouse remains a robust solution, especially when data governance and security are priorities.

Data Lake: Flexibility and Raw Storage

_{Image Source: AWS in Plain English}

The data lake emerged as a direct response to the limitations of traditional storage systems. It's a centralized, flexible repository that allows for the storage of large volumes of data in its raw, original format, regardless of type or structure. This approach has completely changed the way companies handle various types of information, especially when it comes to big data and advanced analytics.

Schema-on-read and unstructured data support

Here we have a fundamental difference. While the data warehouse uses schema-on-write, the data lake adopts the concept of schema-on-readData is stored without a predefined schema, and the structure is applied only at the time of reading, according to the specific needs of each analysis. This flexibility allows organizations to store and process:

• Structured data (tables and spreadsheets)
• Semi-structured data (XML, JSON, logs)
• Unstructured data (images, videos, audios, texts)

When data arrives at the data lake, it remains in its original state, without immediate transformation. The schema is inferred during the query, adapting to the specific needs of each case. This approach makes a lot of sense considering that 80% of the data in the world today is unstructured.

Cloud storage with compute separation

Modern data lake architecture uses cloud storage to provide scalability and cost reduction. The core of this system is typically an object storage service such as Amazon S3, Azure Data Lake Storage, or Google Cloud Storage.

There is a fundamental aspect of data lakes which is separation between storage and computationData resides in low-cost repositories, while computing resources are connected only when needed for processing. This feature allows:

1. Add more storage without scaling compute resources
2. Pay only for the storage actually used
3. Scale out to petabytes of data

Use cases in AI, ML and exploratory analysis

Data lakes work particularly well for powering artificial intelligence, machine learning, and advanced analytics projects. Because they store raw and diverse data, they offer ideal material for:

• Training machine learning models
• Creating personalized recommendation systems
• Retail demand forecast
• Exploratory analyses without structural constraints
• Fraud and anomaly detection

It is worth noting that 72% of high-performing CEOs agree that advanced AI tools offer their organizations a competitive advantage. This highlights the strategic importance of data lakes.

Data Swamp Risks and Data Governance

However, there is a serious problem with poorly managed data lakes. They often turn into data swamps – disorganized repositories where data becomes inaccessible and loses analytical value. Without proper governance, challenges include:

• Duplicate, inconsistent, or corrupted data
• Difficulty locating relevant information
• Quality and reliability issues
• Security and privacy vulnerabilities

To avoid these issues, it's crucial to implement robust governance policies, including data cataloging, well-defined metadata, and role-based access control. Effective governance ensures that the data lake remains a trusted and valuable source of insights for the organization.

Data Lakehouse: The Convergence of Solutions

_{Image Source: Microsoft Learn}

Combining the best features of a data warehouse and a data lake has created an architecture that truly makes sense: the data lakehouse. This hybrid approach addresses limitations encountered in previous solutions, creating an integrated environment capable of processing both structured and unstructured data.

Ingestion, metadata, and consumption layers

The architecture of a data lakehouse is generally composed of five essential layersThe ingestion layer collects data from various sources and transforms it into formats that Lakehouse can store and analyze. This layer connects to internal and external sources such as relational databases, NoSQL, and social networks.

Here, it's important to highlight the metadata layer, which represents the distinguishing feature of this architecture. It functions as a unified catalog that provides information about all objects in storage, enabling advanced management features such as schema enforcement and data auditing. This layer also offers ACID transactions, indexing and file caching for faster queries.

In the consumption layer, we find interfaces that allow access to data through tools such as Power BI and Tableau, enabling BI analysis, visualizations, and machine learning projects.

ACID Transactions with Delta Lake and Apache Iceberg

Delta Lake and Apache Iceberg are foundational technologies that ensure data lakehouse consistency and reliability. Delta Lake, originally developed by Databricks, implements ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability) transactions directly within data lakes.

Delta Lake acts as a layer on top of Parquet files, adding a robust log that records all table changes. These transactions ensure that concurrent operations see consistent versions of the data, preventing corruption even during failures.

Apache Iceberg, in turn, introduces the open table format that brings data warehouse-like capabilities directly to data lakes. Iceberg v3 implements important improvements such as deletion vectors and row lineage, enabling efficient incremental processing.

Support for structured and unstructured data

A significant advantage of a data lakehouse is its ability to efficiently store and process different types of data. The solution maintains the flexibility of a data lake by allowing the storage of raw data in native formats, while adding a structuring layer to optimize queries.

This allows users to explore raw data while simultaneously enjoying optimized performance for analytical queries. Recent implementations, such as Iceberg v3, have introduced new data types for semi-structured and geospatial information.

Hybrid use cases: BI, ML and streaming

The data lakehouse stands out for serving different use cases across the data management lifecycle. It supports:

• BI workflows and data-driven visualization
• Training machine learning models with access to all data
• Real-time data processing, enabling instant insights

This unified architecture enables organizations to reduce data duplication and simplify end-to-end observability. When integrated with streaming capabilities, the lakehouse enables real-time analytics and powers data-driven applications that require immediate decisions.

Technical Comparisons: Data Warehouse vs Data Lake vs Lakehouse

When we analyze these three architectures technically, we see differences that really matter in practice. Each has its own peculiarities that determine where they work best. I'll compare these characteristics to help you understand which solution makes the most sense for each situation.

Difference between data lake and data warehouse

Data warehouses are optimized for structured data through the schema-on-write method, where data is given a predefined format before storage. Data lakes, on the other hand, use schema-on-read, storing information in its raw form and applying structure only at query time. While warehouses prioritize fast queries and efficient reporting, lakes offer greater storage volume at a lower cost.

The practical difference is significant. Warehouses primarily process transactional and business data, while lakes can handle Big Data, IoT, and streaming information. It's like comparing a well-organized library to a giant warehouse where you store everything and organize it later.

Data lake vs. data lakehouse: governance and performance

Here we find one of the biggest problems with data lakes. While they offer exceptional flexibility, they often suffer from quality issues when poorly managed. The concept of a "data swamp" arises when there is inadequate governance.

Lakehouses address this limitation by adding a metadata layer on top of the data lake, providing ACID transactions (atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability) through technologies such as Delta Lake and Apache Iceberg. This layer ensures reliability, version control, and schema enforcement while maintaining the lakes' native flexibility.

Data warehouse vs data lakehouse: scalability and cost

Traditional warehouses face scalability challenges due to their coupled compute and storage architecture. Lakehouses separate these components, allowing independent scaling according to specific needs.

This approach significantly reduces costs, especially for large data volumes. Lakehouses also eliminate duplication, as they store all data types in a single repository, whereas traditional warehouses require additional copies for structured analysis.

Coexistence and integration scenarios

In practice, many organizations implement hybrid architectures that combine these solutions. A common approach involves initially ingesting all data into a data lake and then loading it into specific warehouses for various use cases.

Another strategy uses the lakehouse as a single platform for storage and processing, while maintaining existing warehouses for critical business reporting. Virtualization allows querying data stored in different repositories without moving it, creating a unified access layer.

However, the choice depends largely on the specific needs of each organization and the available budget.

Data Architecture Adoption and Modernization Paths

Modernizing data architectures has become a matter of survival for companies that want to truly compete. Gartner points out that over 80% of enterprise data architectures will need to be rethought by 2026 to meet new digital demands.

Lakehouse: The best of both worlds – data lake and data warehouse

The data lakehouse emerges as a solution that truly unifies the best of both worlds: the flexible and affordable storage of a data lake combined with the structured management capabilities of a data warehouse. This integration breaks down data silos, allowing analysts, data scientists, and engineers to work on the same tables, on the same platform.

The result? Less complexity, less maintenance, and lower costs in the end.

Data warehouse migration to data lakehouse

Transitioning from a traditional data warehouse to a lakehouse doesn't mean throwing everything away and starting from scratch. Rather, it's more about unifying the entire data ecosystem. This process works best when it follows a few steps: first, you assess what you have, then define a clear strategy, implement technical changes, validate everything with good governance, and finally, gradually decommission the old system.

When you plan this migration well, most of the queries and dashboards that already exist in the warehouse can work with very little modification after the migration.

Criteria for choosing the ideal architecture

Choosing a data architecture is a decision that will impact your company for years to come. There are four key points I consider crucial:

• Simplicity: Build with clarity and ease of use in mind
• Scalability: Build with room to grow
• Flexibility: Choose solutions that adapt to change
• Harmony: Align everything with the real business objectives

This choice goes far beyond today's needs—you need to consider the organization's future as well. Having expert guidance in this process can save you a lot of headaches, optimize investments, and make data architecture a real competitive advantage for your company.

Conclusion

After exploring these three architectures, one thing becomes clear: there's no perfect solution for every situation. Each has its strengths and limitations, and this is natural when we talk about technology.

Traditional data warehouses remain solid for those who need consistent structure and reliable reporting. However, they become limited when you need to deal with unstructured data—and we know that this represents the majority of information today.

Data lakes have brought a flexibility many people never imagined possible. You can store virtually anything, and this has opened doors to machine learning and analytics that were previously unthinkable. But here's the problem: without proper governance, they become veritable digital swamps where no one can find anything useful.

The data lakehouse emerges as this attempt to capture the best of both worlds. A solution that promises structure when you need it, flexibility when you need it. It sounds promising, but like any new technology, it's still proving its worth in practice.

The question you should ask yourself is not which technology is superior, but rather: which one solves my organization's real problems?

If your company relies on structured reporting and traditional analytics, a data warehouse may still be your best option. If you're immersed in AI projects and need to process all types of data, data lakes make sense. And if you want a unified solution that eliminates silos, a data lakehouse may be the way to go.

But there's something more important than technology choice: data governance. No matter which architecture you choose, without effective governance, your data won't generate the insights you expect.

We're seeing a clear trend toward data lakehouses, especially for companies looking to modernize their infrastructure. This represents more than a technological shift—it's a new way of thinking about how we democratize access to data.

However, it's important to remember that all this technological evolution should serve to improve human decision-making, not replace critical thinking. Technology changes, but the need for wisdom to interpret data and make good decisions remains fundamentally human.

Key Takeaways

Understanding the differences between a data warehouse, data lake, and data lakehouse is crucial to choosing the ideal data architecture for your organization and maximizing the value of your data.

• Data warehouses are ideal for structured data and BI reporting, but limited for unstructured data that represents 80% of current information

• Data lakes offer maximum flexibility to store any type of data at low cost, but require strict governance to avoid “digital swamps”

• Data lakehouses combine the best of both worlds: warehouse structure and performance with lake flexibility and economy

• The choice of architecture must consider data volume, variety of sources, processing speed and the organization's available budget

• Implementing effective data governance is essential in any architecture to transform raw data into valuable business insights

The data lakehouse represents the natural evolution of data architectures, offering a unified solution that eliminates information silos and enables more agile analysis. This trend points to a future where organizations can democratize access to data and make more informed decisions, regardless of the type or format of the information available.